The Little Albert experiment was a case study showing empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study also provides an example of stimulus generalization. It was carried out by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, at Johns Hopkins University.
- 1 Why is Little Albert not a case study?
- 2 What was the significance of the Little Albert Case Study?
- 3 What happened to Little Albert experiment?
- 4 How was the Little Albert experiment conducted?
- 5 What was the major criticism of the Little Albert experiment?
- 6 What happened to Little Albert quizlet?
- 7 What was The Little Albert experiment hypothesis?
- 8 How did the Little Albert experiment contribute to the field of behavioral psychology?
- 9 What did John B Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrate with their studies of Little Albert?
- 10 Did Little Albert’s mother give consent?
- 11 What ethical principles were violated in the Little Albert study?
- 12 Is known for using Little Albert in his studies on human emotion?
- 13 What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
- 14 What would you predict about Little Albert based on the principle of spontaneous recovery?
- 15 What happened to Little Albert after Watson was done with him?
Why is Little Albert not a case study?
First, the experimental design and process were not carefully constructed. The experiment also raises many ethical concerns. Little Albert was harmed during this experiment—he left the experiment with a previously nonexistent fear. By today’s standards, the Little Albert experiment would not be allowed.
What was the significance of the Little Albert Case Study?
The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that classical conditioning could be used to create a phobia. A phobia is an irrational fear, that is out of proportion to the danger. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.
What happened to Little Albert experiment?
By the time Albert left the study at just over one year of age, the researchers reported that this fear had generalized to a dog and other furry animals and objects. No one knows what eventually happened to Albert, because his identity remained a mystery for over 90 years.
How was the Little Albert experiment conducted?
A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert’s back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer each time the baby touched the rat. Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear.
What was the major criticism of the Little Albert experiment?
The experiment was not carefully designed or conducted, Little Albert’s Fears were not Objectively Measured, but were Subjectively Observed. The experiment was unethical because Watson and Raynor, did not extinguish Little Albert’s Fear Response to furry animals and objects.
What happened to Little Albert quizlet?
The question of what happened to Little Albert has long been one of psychology’s mysteries. Watson and Rayner were unable to attempt to eliminate the boy’s conditioned fear because he moved with his mother shortly after the experiment ended.
What was The Little Albert experiment hypothesis?
The “Little Albert Experiment” took place in the early 20th century, performed by John B. They hypothesized that following the procedure of classic conditioning, they could condition “little Albert” to fear things that normally go without fear from children.
How did the Little Albert experiment contribute to the field of behavioral psychology?
The Little Albert experiment is a demonstration of a classic conditioning such as the naturally occurring stimuli, which are what behaviorists study. Psychological researchers B.F. Skinner, Ivan Pavlov, and John B. Watson’s work contributed to psychology through the development of methodological behaviorism.
What did John B Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrate with their studies of Little Albert?
Watson’s Little Albert experiment. Watson and Rosalie Rayner demonstrate with their studies of Little Albert? emotion can be a conditioned response. Harold catches fish throughout the day at unpredictable intervals.
Did Little Albert’s mother give consent?
Albert was only nine months old at this time. Now, Albert could not give consent himself as he was an infant. Accordingly, this became one of the grounds on which the experiment was called unethical. Albert’s mother did give her consent and was given money by Watson and Rayner to do so.
What ethical principles were violated in the Little Albert study?
according to today’s ethical standards, the nature of the study itself would be considered unethical, as it did not protect Albert from psychological harm, because its purpose was to induce a state of fear. Many sources claim that Little Albert was used as a subject in the study without the permission of his mother.
Is known for using Little Albert in his studies on human emotion?
John B. Watson used the principles of classical conditioning in the study of human emotion. Thus began Watson’s work with his graduate student Rosalie Rayner and a baby called Little Albert.
What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
What happened after “Little Albert” was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat? Stimulus generalization occurred; Albert responded with fear to other furry animals and fuzzy objects.
What would you predict about Little Albert based on the principle of spontaneous recovery?
What would you predict about Little Albert based on principle of spontaneous recovery? Little Albert would eventually forget about his fear to the white rat, sealskin coat, rabbit, and the dog.
What happened to Little Albert after Watson was done with him?
Soon after the experiments, Little Albert and his mother moved away from John Hopkins and disappeared. By tracking down financial records Beck found out that he was most likely to be the illegitimate son of the campus nurse, Arvilla Merritte, who had a boy called, Douglas.